Koyaanisqatsi is a MESS
3
By eugenefields
I adore Koyaanisqatsi and already had a version at 160bps so imagine my shock when I hear this muffled recording. The chorals in the piece are almost Non existent. All the translucence of the Chorals is gone... How can this be?? And the Balance seems very changed between the Orchestra and the Electronic? What have they done to this music? It is not near what I am used to hearing. What a shame. I was expecting a Pristine recording. iTunes should Yank this release...
I don't know if its the recording itself or the encoding thats off. Or it could be a combination. But all the clarity from the recording is gone. I was so expecting a marvelous experience. I'm so disappointed.
music out of balance
4
By sauget.diblosio
hate to say it, but i still prefer my 1983 recording (i've only listened to the 1998 re-recording once-- philip glass is wrong). while it is good, great really, to finally have ALL of the music (and why i gave it four stars), the mixes of the stuff we all already know and love so well are just... off (which is why it didn't get five). like others have said, the vocals and electronics are lost way in the back on some tracks, and a lot of the horns are way too bright. it's not a problem with most of the tracks, and overall the album sounds great, but when the issue does come up, it really stands out.
i guess we'll have to wait another ten years for the "this time we really mean it" definitive version.
Really Great!
4
By Newark Wilder
I was pretty excited when I heard this had come out, being one of the big dorks who dug around & bought the original from Tower Records online. It sure is great to have the continuity of the full film score; they are inextricably bound in a way that few film scores are with their partner movies...the equally-groundbreaking soundtrack of "A Clockwork Orange" also comes to mind.
I thought JapanShane was indeed being a fussbudget with his comment about the "Pruitt Igoe" vocals, but holy crackers, he was really right! I really have to wonder if it was somehow intentional, but given Glass's impeccable standards, I don't know how it could be possible. The electronic instruments and vocals are lost behind the orchestral mix, and the result is nowhere near the clarity and power of the 1983 release. Yet some tracks sound quite a lot better, more forceful and distinct than the "first original." It does indeed indicate something must still be up with the master tapes in this epic tale of a soundtrack that's as revolutionary as its movie. If you're reading this, you care enough to have them both! The 1998 version, IMHO, is not for the Glass-heads and strict musicologists that aren't ALSO film purists. But if you're one of each, just buy 'em all!
Complete, but could have been better?
3
By ChicagoShane
First of all I have to say that I am reviewing the CD and presentation, not the music itself. The music is "classic" Glass and doesn't get any better than this. If you don't already have a recording of this music and soundtrack, or are looking to add a little Philip Glass to your collection, please pick this one up.
That being said, I wouldn't retire the orginial 1983 recording you might have in rotation just yet.
When I saw on the Philip Glass website "contains sound effects from the movie", I knew something might be a little off. While this release finally does justice to the film and it's music, it still leaves a little more to be desired.
The reason why it contains the sound effects from the movie is becuase it seems like all Orange Mountain really did was pull the *actual* soundtrack right from the film and clean it up with filters. In doing this, some tracks did not change (Organic and Clouds for example). However, some tracks, expeically Pruitt Igoe, really suffer from poor mixing. The vocal track on Pruitt Igoe is almost buried in the background with the instruments since there was no way to seperate out the voices and let them stand out. As a result, the orginial 1983 soundtrack recording is still the only one that has the clearest and most properly balenced mix. The emotional resonance of the vocals in Pruitt Igoe can be heard and felt still only in that recording.
I know it may be nitpicking, but really compare the two. It is extremely nice to finally have the *glue* that holds all the tracks together, but the tracks themselves seem lackluster when compared to the 1983 recording. It just makes me wonder if something has happened to the master recordings for the film and might be a reason why we didn't see a CD with the brightness of the first recording combined with the missing elements from this recording.
Also, just to let you know where I am comming from, I don't even consider the 1998 version to even be from the movie. It is so lackluster when compared to the orginial that I feel it is more an interpertation of the movie (or even inspired by), rather than an attempt to reconstruct the actual music.
AWESOME!!!
5
By Bauerman
I am a huge Philip Glass fan. I am glad to have ALL of the music. Here's the breakdown:
The original issue of the original soundtrack (from the early 80's) cut some tracks from the recording. The ones that were kept were cut for time, most nobaly "The Grid". This is understandable, given the capacity of media back then. Records and tape limited how long a track could be as well as album order. Since almost half of the music is in the last three tracks ("The Grid" and "Prophecies" total 28 minutes+), It may have been impossible to group them on the same side of the cassete or vinyl record, in the fashion that extended vinyl singles would be cut to part 1 and part 2 on opposite sides.
The 90's re-recording is also EXCELLENT. Philip Glass had good reason to praise it; his ensemble is better at playing the score, now having 10 years more to learn it. However, it is STILL MISSING SOME TRACKS. That album omits the connecting tissues (and admits so in the liner notes). These omitted tracks are Pruitt Igoe Coda (misspelled in the 90's recording, as Pruitt-Igoe is the name of the housing development dynamited during this famous sequence), Slo Mo People, Microchip, and Translations and Credits.
This recording restores ALL segments in their original recording.
I might note that not all of the music was written by Philip Glass. The credits for the film list Michael Hoenig as the comopser of additional music. Does this account for the tracks missing from the 90's recording? Perhaps the liner notes for this album would make this clear.
It's interesting that the original recording is reissued so close to the "Watchmen" soundtrack, which actually uses segments from this recording rather than the 90's re-recording. Did "Watchmen" perhaps re-awaken an interest among record companies to reissue the original? I hope so. In any case, it's good to see the original back.
This is the one, the original recording!
5
By CaptHarlock
Finally the entire recording, as heard in the film, is available. It certainly took long enough, 27 years. Ignore the newer recording regardless of Mr. Glass' higher opinion of it. This is the music that contains the power, thoughtfulness and peace that carried the film over from a coffee table book of images into a unique philosophical statement. On it's own this music is a world unto it's own.
At Last!
5
By Days in Rose Park
Finally, after nearly 30 years, we have the complete score for this film, in chronological order, from beginning to end. The music is every bit as powerful as the film itself, and one can't help but remember Reggio's remarkable images while listening to this album. Thank you, Orange Mountain Music--this album has been a long time in coming, but the final product is worth the wait.
eh
3
By Boolez
The three stars are not for fhe music, everyone who's read my Glass reviews knows my thought on the composer. I'm only amazed that no one else has reviewed it. If for nothing else it's the complete soundtrack so it would be worth the money for Glass fans to get it just for that. As a stand alone work it doesn't move me but get the movie to get the whole experience. It sort of works in that regard.